Pages

Saturday, July 12, 2025

Acadia National Park; What Do I Know?

Sand Beach - Acadia National Park - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved
THERE ARE more than 60 National Parks in the U.S. and its territories. I have visited just 7 of them and spent time of any note in just 4 of them. Given that, my honest answer to the question posed in the title is: not really very much.

Stone Bridge over Park Loop Road - Acadia National Park - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

ON MARCH 1, 1872, during the presidency of Ulysses S. Grant, Congress designated Yellowstone as the first national park in the United States and the world. in 1916, President Woodrow Wilson signed into law a bill that created the National Park Service, and administrative division (bureau) of the U.S. Department of the Interior. Though the first half century, the park was maintaiened in fits and starts, being at one time occupied by the U.S. Army to fend off poachers and timber thieves. But it endured, and its progeny is manifest in not only the 60 parks in the U.S. but the numerous national parks in the many countries of the world.

Classic View of Frenchman Bay from Cadillac Mountain
Acadia National Park - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

I WAS recently in Great Smoky Mountains National Park (one of only 2 that I have been in more than once), and it occured to me that it might be fun to blog about the ones I have visited, as I have come away from each of them with images that I liked.

Jordan Pond ("Bubbles" in the background)
Acadia National Park - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

WHILE NOT the first National Park I visited, Acadia National Park comes to mind when I try to think of my favorite. It may be because for my kind of photography, it is the most diverse that I have visited. Originally named LaFayette National Park in 1919, the par was renamed Acadia in 1929.  Acadia is not one of the largest parks, occupying just under 50,000 acres. Yellowstone alone takes up well over 2 million acres (and it is not the largest). Acadia does have the distinction, though, of being the first National Park east of the Mississippi, and the additional distinction of being the first National Park to be formed from donations of private land. Unlike the vast acres of Yellowstone and Adjacent Grand Teton, the borders of Acadia are more limited. It is often difficult to know when you are in the park or out of it. Most of the park is situated on Mt. Desert Isle, an island in northeastern Maine, in the Gulf of Maine, on the Atlantic Ocean. Those parts of Mt. Desert Isle which are not part of the park are bucolic and mostly true blue collar lobster fishing communities, the most noted of which are Bernard, Bass Harbor, and Northeast Harbor and Southwest Harbor, which mark the east and west shores of the Somes Sound, a deep waterway up into the island that ends near the picturesque village of Somesville (best known for its iconic bridge). 

Hunter Creek - Acadia National Park - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

PHOTOGRAPHY IN National Parks can be challenging for a number of reasons. Particularly in the "iconic" sections of the parks, one of the biggest obstacles is the number of visitors. The parks were created to allow (and even induce) the citizenry to visit them and appreciate our natural wonders. It has worked. Perhaps too successfully. With crowds has come litter, polution, destruction of the sometimes delicate ecosystems, and stress on wildife, among other things. For a photographer looking to make beautiful images of our natural environment, this can certainly degrade those opportunities. In terms of automobiles and people in the image, we have - in the past - had the opportunity to simply patiently wait for our scene to clear. In recent years, that has become more difficult as the numbers of visitors have rapidly increased, making the park often overcrowded. This is evident in places like the main roads through Yellowstone, the Cade's Cove Park Loop Road in Great Smoky Mountains, and the Park Loop Roads in Acadia.

Park Loop Road in full Fall Foliage
Acadia National Park - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

FORTUNATELY FOR us, Acadia is one of the places that can be visited in the off-season and yield some wonderful photographic opportunities. We did that. Although we almost missed the fall foliage (and probably did miss the proverbial "peak"), there was still abundant fall color around us. The nearby iconic village of Bar Harbor is a famous and popular tourist destination during the summer months, even recently becoming a major port stop for cruise ships on the U.S. and Canadian Atlantic coast. 

Cruise Ship in Bar Harbor, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

WE LEARNED, though, that the climax of the season for Bar Harbor is the Columbus Day holiday weekend. We were a week after that and though we missed the "cheap" lobster rolls at the lobster pounds, we did just sneak in a full lobster dinner at one of the Bar Harbor legendary lobster restaurants the night before they closed for the season. But the real win for us was: NO CROWDS! Not anywhere. We had the run of the place and thoroughly enjoyed our time.

Otter Cliff - Acadia National Park - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

MOST OF the iconic shots you have seen of the park over the years are easily located (and often well-marked) within the park. There was one elusive spot that we were rather proud that we found. There is a shot down on the rocks at Otter Beach that shows Otter Cliff (a granite cliff that turns pink during appropriate sun conditions) in the distance. That is where most photographers make their shots from. It is plainly visible and quite accessible from the road. But there is a better spot. My research paid off as one of the books I read about photographing the area disclosed this location, known as the cobblestone beach for its smooth, rounded stones that have been shaped by centuries of wave action. There is a not well known (nor marked) pathway which takes some searching and looking to find that will take you down to the cobblestone beach. If you find it, be careful, as the rounded stones shift easily and you could end up with a twisted or sprained ankle. But the discovery was worth it, as those cobbles make (in my opinion) a much nicer foreground for that Otter Cliff shot.

Park Road - Acadia National Park - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

I THINK it is fair to say that a photography trip to Acadia National Park should really be viewed as a trip to Acadia National Park and vicinity. As I mentioned, the park proper, while having some pretty great (if iconic) photographic sites, is quite small. And once you get beyond shooting the icons: The Bubbles, Otter Beach, and Cadillac Mountain, the real "show" is probably mostly in that "vicinity" part. You are going to want to venture out of the park!

Colorful Lobster Boats - Mt. Desert Isle; Bernard, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

You are going to want to venture out of the park

WE SPENT numerous early mornings and late afternoons in the lobster harbors of Bernard and Southwest Harbor, on the island, as well as a couple trips to the noted (and iconic) Bass Harbor Lighthouse. Later in our trip we ventured off Mt. Desert Island and over to the Penobscot Peninsula to the west of the Isle, and on down through Deer Isle to my favorite of all the Lobster Harbors: Stonington. It is hard for a photographer not to get excited about the colorful and shapely boats, surrounded by everyman fishing piers and buildings, and this is particularly the case when there is some fall foliage in the scene. Northeast Harbor seemed a lot more of a recreational boating harbor and - dare I say: more "upscale" than the others - so hence, less photogenic.

Southwest Harbor - Mt. Desert Isle; Southwest Harbor, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

FOR ME perhaps the second largest impediment to good photography is the operating hours of some parts of many parks. Almost all of them cover ground that is not gated, but often the parts of the part that might lend itself to pre-dawn to sunrise and sunset to twilight are gated. And most of the time they are regulated under a "dawn to dusk" test. There are a couple difficulties with that for the photographer. First, there is no hard and fast definition of dawn to dusk, and sometimes the powers that be take some license with that. More importantly, however, in order to make a really good "sunrise" image, we really need to be at our shooting point and set up for the shot well before the actual event. Anyone who has "been there," knows that not only is that 340 minutes or so before the actual sunrise just a wonderful time, but often the light just before the "main event" can be - for lack of a better description - "magical." The problem with "dawn to dusk / "sunrise - sunset" gating is that the photo is rarely just inside the gate!

Lobster Boats - Mt. Desert Isle; Bernard, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

THIS PROBLEM usually reverses itself at night. I have often made what I consider to be my best "sunset" images after the sun dips below the horizon. That is - technically - after sunset. And if you are a distance from a gated park entrance, you may have a problem if you (and your vehicle) are inside the gates at that time. There are, of course, many parks and many parts of parks that are not gated, and one of the enjoyable components to park photography can be finding those spots. But "dawn to dusk" often forces the photographer to photograph only during the daylight hours, missing what can often be the most pleasing and dramatic lighting conditions for photography. As in all my travel, I shoot pretty much all the time, with a thought process that I may never get another chance at a place. While I am not unhappy with my results most of the time, I sure would like to have more latitude to shoot during the "good light" hours of the day.

Acadia National Park Seashore - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

NOT SO in Acadia. At least not historically (read on though, for some not so happy changes). We found virtually all the roads and entrances to be open virtually all the time. We had no difficulty with arriving on location in the morning darkness, and occasionally coming back to our bed and breakfast facility after dark. The only exception to this was (and is) the road up to the top of Cadillac Mountain. That is gated and opens and closes at certain posted hours. In 2009, as late in the season as we were, we didn't have any problem accessing the road during the day, and we did drive up to see the view (it is a kind of "must see/must do" for park visitors). I understand that things have vastly changed now. In 1921, the Park Service instituted a somewhat controversial new vehicle reservation policy, ostensibly to ease congestion (which, as in all of our national parks, has become a major problem at times). I read recently (anecdotally and on Face Book so "for what its worth") that Bass Harbor (or some municipal authority) is going to begin a similar reservation system and a charge for visits to the Bass Harbor Light. It is hard to know what to make of all of this - once many wonderful viewing and photography opportunities being more heavily visited and in many cases consequently more heavily regulated. But it is part of the new reality.

Bass Harbor Light - Mt. Desert Isle; Bass Harbor, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

THIS PROBLEM usually reverses itself at night. I have often made what I consider to be my best "sunset" images after the sun dips below the horizon. That is - technically - after sunset. And if you are a distance from a gated park entrance, you may have a problem if you (and your vehicle) are inside the gates at that time. There are, of course, many parks and many parts of parks that are not gated, and one of the enjoyable components to park photography can be finding those spots.

Some old traditional Lobster Traps - Stonington, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

MOST NATIONAL Parks are not a fenced-in boundary type of property. Indeed, in many cases, main roads go right through the heart of the park. This often leaves vast areas of the parks that are not bounded or gated. While access to the iconic areas of the parks are often time-restricted, and visited only by park-operated access roads, there are so many other areas that are not - and are worth exploring and photographing. Acadia may be the best example of a diverse photographic opportunity. Exploring the often quaint little lobster harbor towns and poking around the marinas, always full of lobster traps, buoys, and other trappings of the trade can be fun and photographically rewarding.

Traps and Buoys - the equipment of the Lobster Industry - Bernard, Maine
 Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

IN "DOWNEAST," Maine (an odd tradition indeed: the futher north and east you go, the more "downeast" you are), there are seascapes, wild cranberry fields which turn a beautiful red in the fall, and boats almost everywhere you turn. The character is essentially rural and the majority of industry decidedly fishing-oriented. And not just any fishing. Lobster fishing.

Lobster Fisherman - Stonington, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

THE STORY behind the "LDB III": One afternoon when we were in Stonington, I was set up to shoot the harbor and was looking for compositions. The fishermen had (mostly) just returned from pulling traps for the day and were offloading at the pound quite near where I was shooting. One of the fishermen had finished, and run his boat to his mooring buoy, just out in front of me. I photographed his boat and a couple images of him running back to shore in his dinghy. As he stepped out of the dinghy, he approached me (turns out his pickup was parked directly behind me). A friendly sort, we talked about photography and lobster fishing. And on the afternoon, I got a bit of an education on the industry. My buddy, Rich and I had been involved in some conjecture about the cost of one of the boats. He guessed way too low. I guessed a bit higher and came closer. Suffice it to say that the equipment for a modest operation, boats, traps, mooring, maintenance and all was in the hundreds of thousands, approaching $1 million (and that was back in 2009). It went up from there.

Colorful Lines - More trappings of the Trade - Bernard, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

I SPENT a few years in my youth working on family dairy farms. The lobster fishing industry has many parallels. This gentleman worked on his own. They are regulated on when they can start pulling traps - usually shortly after sunrise. But his typical day - during the season - meant he was at the harboar around 4:00 a.m., loading the boat, doing maintenance, etc. His "staked out" trap lines were about 30-40 minutes from the harbor. He would be there and ready to pull at the instant the clock hit the regulated time. Often, it would be dark by the time he returned, off loaded and closed things down. Income was pretty good in a good year (much like the crop farmers I worked closely with during my legal career), but not a "get rich" proposition. It was - like family farming - a labor of love and often a generational thing. It was fun to talk with the guy and I will always remember his friendly openness.

Panoramic view of the Stonington, Maine Lobster Harbor
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

ONE ICONIC scene that you probably should not miss while at the park (still on Mt. Desert Isle, but not actually in the park), is the Somesville white bridge. Depending on conditions, you can find varying surrounding photographic elements, like flowers and foliage. The bridge can actually be shot from different viewpoints, but the straight on perspective is the "iconic" image. Officially, the Thaddeus Shepley Somes Memorial Bridge, it is one of the most often photographed sights in Maine, and is often used for wedding photography and graduation shots.

Somesville Bridge - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

ONE THING I found humorous as I read on-line about the Somesville Bridge was that it is characterized as "near Bar Harbor." As the proverbial crow flies, it is about 6 miles from the center of Bar Harbor. We learned a saying, though, while we were in the area: "you can't get there from here." Obviously you can. πŸ˜•What they really meant was there is no direct route. Driving from Bar Harbor, you must make 2 turns (first to the right for a short jog, and then back to the left), in order to negotiate your way around the northern end of the Somesville Sound. Worth the drive.

Wild Cranberries - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

ON THE way, during the fall and late fall months, you will most certainly see some fields dotted with wild cranberry bushes. You will know because much like the tree-laden foliage of fall, cranberry bush leaves turn bright red.

Acadia National Park Seashore - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved

BEING AN island in the middle of the Atlantic, you can certainly expect to have some spectacular views in and around the park. Indeed, they are almost everywhere you look.

Otter Cliffs from the cobblestone beach - Acadia National Park - Mt. Desert Isle, Maine
Copyright Andy Richards 2009 - All Rights Reserved


Wednesday, July 9, 2025

It Has Got To Be The Camera

 THIS IS a thought (probably qualifies as a rant) that has been simmering for the past several months. Everybody who knows anything about me knows I am an unapologetic "gear" guy. There are a lot of us out there. But we are not all the same. We all have reasons. In my opinion, some (mine of course 😏) are valid. Some are not.

I OWN (currently) 2 different camera systems (3 if you count my smartphone). Over the years, I have owned several others. On numerous occasions here I have attempted to articulate my reasons for each system and what works for me and what doesn't. I don't think I have ever said - or even (intentionally) implied - that my choices of systems made "better" images than others. We will each have our own needs and preferences. That's o.k. It is what make the world turn for photographic equipment sellers and manufacturers.

I don't care what you shot the image with

FOR EACH system/camera I own, I have often sought, and joined (these days mostly FB) "Groups" dedicated to those cameras/systems. I do it expecting to glean some wisdom about how they work and what little nuances might be hiding in the software or hardware. I do it to see what accessories are specifically matched up to them. I do it to see what kind of new "capabilities" (focus "stacking," computational photography capabilities, etc.).

WHAT I don't expect from them is photos posted to imply (or even demonstrate) that this camera takes "the best" photographs!  Or even just "takes good photographs." Yet I would judge that at least 50% of the posts on many of these group sites are such photos. Sometimes spectacular and sometimes . . . well . . . not so much. But that really doesn't matter. I see spectacular photos on all of them. All of the time. Just as I see spectacular photos on many other sites and in many other places. Every time I go to one of these pages and see a photo posted with a shot with my [insert any brand] I roll my eyes. Why? Because I don't care what you shot the image with! I mean, really, if it is a great image, it is a great image. If its not? Then its not. I have made my share of not so great images - sometimes with some pretty high end equipment.

. . . photos posted to imply (or even demonstrate) that this camera takes "the best" photographs!

VIRTUALLY EVERY knowledgeable photographer (if s/he is being honest) knows that it is not the camera that makes or breaks an image. It is true that technical components like "noise," image size, etc., are affected by the camera (or perhaps more accurately, the sensor). It is also true that a models mechanical capabilities (i.e., autofocus and things like subject recognition are definite improvements in technology that assist the skilled shooter. If the posted image is made to show the use of these things, or even how well the image stands up to pixel peeping, that is one thing. But most of the time they are posted to show how good they are and that they were shot with the poster's concept of "the best" camera.

I SUPPOSE the other thing about an on-line rant (in any form, including a blog), is that by posting it, we are really just "tilting at windmills." People won't stop posting photos on camera-specific sites with the implication that it is a better photo because it was shot with that camera model. But they should. There are plenty of sites for that. There, I said it.  I got it off my chest. And mostly wasted a few hundred bits of space and time I can never recover. But seriously folks. It is not the camera!

Saturday, June 21, 2025

More Brackets and Stuff



I MAY have an obsession with camera brackets, LOL. I know this is the third blog in a row on the topic. The immediately prior blog was about my newest "bracket-discovery," the "i-bracket." Unless extensive use of this one in the field reveals otherwise, I think I have stumbled upon the best solution for me. But it reminds me that it has been an interesting and at times meandering, journey. After this, I'll stop. For a while. πŸ˜†

I SHOOT from a tripod 95% of the time when I am out shooting landscapes. At one time, it was probably 95% for all images of any kind, but my last 10 years of travel has made me change that approach, engaging in a lot more handheld shots. But when I can, I am going to be using that tripod. So these "bracket" gadgets occupy a fair amount of my attention. In the beginning, we all screwed our camera directly onto the tripod with the socket in the camera base. Pretty inconvenient, and depending on the tripod head, difficult to change from landscape to portrait orientation.

Arca - Swiss style QR

THEN, SOMETIME in the 1990s, the Arca Swiss company introduced (what I believe to be) the first "quick release" (QR) system for cameras. It was (is) disarmingly simple and secure (my father was a professional engineer and was fond of saying that the most effective design was usually the simplest - I have begun referring to these designs as "elegantly simple"). It is a dovetail arrangement consisting of a machined, dovetail "v" plate that secures to the camera base and a reverse "v" receptacle clamp. This arrangement can be firmly tightened down. There are some other QR systems, but frankly, I don't know why they bothered. The perhaps most common was the Bogen/Manfrotto system which involved a hexagon shaped plate that snapped into a spring-loaded receiver with a lever release (they later released an alternate, smaller "consumer" square plate and receiver). Bogen was kind of the "everyman" tripod for many years (especially before the carbon fiber boom) and I don't know anybody who didn't own at least one of them over the years. Gitzo tripods (now also owned by Manfrotto) - which had their own quirky QR setup - was the "gold" standard for tripods. But the Bogen models were the workhorse and much less costly. The QR system on them, however, was their achilles heel, in my opinion (though they doggedly continue to use that system for most of their tripods). Because I owned several Bogen tripods and heads, I felt "stuck" with their system. It was heavy, bulky, and I never really trusted it to securely hold. I probably could have used the Bogen legs only and attached an Arca Swiss style head. I never did, and when the opportunity presented itself, I moved to a carbon fiber tripod and the Arca Swiss system. For a very brief period, I owned the Bogen L-bracket pictured below, and, while it served the intended purpose, it was - anything - worse than their standard gear. It was large, heavy, clunky and certainly didn't engender thoughs of secure clamping any more than the original stuff did.


Bogen QR Systems

AT THE same time, tripod heads were undergoing an evolution and today, the former 3-way adjustable head has been mostly replaced with the ball head. One of the problems with the ball head for landscape photographers was the versatilityy of the ballhead that was so championed, was also the downfall of something a lot of us landscape shooters value: precision. It was difficult, if not impossible, to change the orientation from landscape to portrait on a ballhead.

Arca - Swiss style L-bracket

THE L-BRACKET, which became popular in the 2000s, solved that problem. It fit my definition of an elegantly simple solution. The solution was only partial and and short-lived, however. As camera bodies became more complex, the "traditional" L-bracket began to interfere with the movable rear LCD panels that have become popular. Not to mention the numerous electronics and memory card ports that now adorn modern bodies. While L-bracket makers have partially addressed this problem, they have not been entirely successful. Seems like there has to be a better solution. There are some contenders out there, to compete with the L-Bracket. I think my own newest discovery - the "i-bracket" may be the best one. It certainly fits the "elegantly simple" description.

Bogen L-bracket

THE OTHER approach that has rapidly become a thing - at least on the online accessory market - is the camera-mounted, rotating tripod collar. To the best of my knowledge, the first of these was introduced by a company named Atoll a few years back. I reviewed it (and for the life of me, cannot find the blog where I did that) and concluded that it was a nice idea not yet ready for prime time. They were originally designed and released for a limited number of camera models (Sony, Canon and Nikon). I personally didn't think the model I tested felt very durable or sturdy. Following up on them, several competitors have released their own copies, including Neewer, Ulanzi, Smallrig, iShoot and Nisi. Each has its pros and cons (not the least of which is incompatibility with certain popular lenses). And now, more recently, Atoll has released its newest model, the AtollX, which purportedly is more of a universal design and is said to fit most camera/lens combinations. For articulating LCD screen lovers (I am one), these all appear to rotate the wrong way, rendering the screen pretty much useless. πŸ˜’

New Atoll "X" collar

NOW, THERE is another variation, the 90 - degree 1/2 lens collar, which looks like about a 1/2 cutaway of the circular collar and essentially performs the same function (moving from landscape to portrait orientation). I like the idea with these collar arrangements because once mounted, there is no need to remove the camera and re-orient it (much like the lens collars on many telephoto lenses). This makes the transition back and forth smooth and seamless. I am just still concerned about the shortcomings and the potential lack of sturdiness of the arrangement. Time will tell.

FOR THOSE who may have tried one or more of these devices, I would love to hear your feedback on them in the comments section below. And now, having beat brackets to death, I think you will agree: it is time to move on to a different topic. 😏